For those of you who complain, try to think so that way. If you have to, say 50K, which means 50K that CP had to shoot. This means that CP has already spent 50K of hard-earned money by LESI to care for the child (ren) you have helped. The cost of the child increase is doubled for the PC when the PNCP has decided not to pay. There is not even non-financial support. If you do not visit your child, the KP loses potential income, he cannot work in the evenings/weekends, which limits his income potential. There is a good reason why these laws are in effect. The arrears accumulated under a separation agreement are due to a contractual obligation to assist. A separation contract is a contract that, like any other contract, can be obtained through the courts. a mother can again keep the children on a 13 almost 14 years.
if she does not have a child welfare order order ordered or ordered by a court, he pays for the child care she provides because she has agreed not to be a couple who is never married. it pays for half of what the child needs when asked to pay, and since while no cash written agreement that can be used as a simple gift You can always look for work and do it. If you are not and just leave not to pay, the court will see this and withdraw this amount. To say that an unre conserved parental payment “corresponds” to the amount of money the parent distributes is false. No madam. If this is the case, the courts could require both parents to place the same amount of STDS in an account where the money can only be used for the child. That is not how this happens because court-ordered payments are biased and obsolete. If the non-free parent does not pay for child care, why didn`t you go to court and ask them to reduce custody because you didn`t work? My ex did it, but he had been waiting for it for 5 years. This does not stop the fact that you have to support your children. It is not fair for a parent to have all this burden when it takes two to bring him into the world. Do not try to negotiate such an agreement alone or extrajudicially, as it will probably not apply. My husband owes family allowances and they take him every week from his check, but he has custody of the 3 children for the last 5 years there he always pays when he has the children, when she goes directly to the mother of his children, too.
If he files taxes, she gets it too, the children don`t see a penny After we say the child will be 18 and eventually convince the mother to go after the CS. How is fair play for every father? A father who knows he has had a child should be expected to pay CS, but a father who has no documented evidence or knowledge of the event that occurred in addition to hitting some chicks a few years ago.